Despite Good Ties With Adam Silver, Caitlin Clark Rejects NBA Commissioner’s 2 Notions Including All-Star Format
Despite Good Ties With Adam Silver, Caitlin Clark Rejects NBA Commissioner’s 2 Notions Including All-Star Format
Basketball is a game of finesse and conviction, a balance of artistry and precision. Caitlin Clark, the Indiana Fever star, embodies these qualities not only on the court but also in her perspective on the game’s evolution. Fresh off a remarkable rookie season that earned her WNBA Rookie of the Year honors, Clark has proven she’s unafraid to challenge even the most prominent voices in basketball—NBA Commissioner Adam Silver included. Her views on the All-Star format and in-season tournaments highlight her grounded approach to the game, setting her apart in an era of flashy reinvention.
According to a recent episode of “New Heights with Jason and Travis Kelce,” Clark made her stance clear on Silver’s proposals during the podcast’s “We Gotta Ask” segment. Discussing the NBA’s evolving All-Star format, Clark didn’t hold back. “Ohh see, that’s tough, four teams of eight with one team being the Rising Stars,” she began.
Referring to Kevin Durant’s recent comments, she continued, “I saw Kevin Durant said this today or maybe yesterday, or whenever it was, but they should go back to East vs. West, and that’s when I loved it. I think it should be East vs. West. That’s true… It’s like East versus West, battle it out.” She added emphatically, “I’m on board for East versus West All-Stars. I think that’s the whole point of it. That’s why you’re an All-Star—it’s the best from the East vs. the best from the West. Play each other, see which side is better.”
Clark’s sentiments resonated with Jason Kelce, who echoed her critique of the NBA’s innovations. “I’m not gonna lie,” Kelce said, “I’m not a fan of any of these in-season tournaments that the NBA’s doing.” Their candid exchange struck a chord, emphasizing how tradition and simplicity often hold a special place in the hearts of players and fans alike.
Their shared stance against innovation raises an intriguing question: Can the allure of basketball’s roots outshine the appeal of modern reinvention?